No. This is built for professionals who work with, or plan to work with, people experiencing chronic pain, illness, or nervous system dysregulation.

That includes licensed therapists and counselors, nurse practitioners, physicians, physical and occupational therapists, dietitians, coaches, and somatic and bodywork practitioners. What matters is that you work inside your own scope of practice. I teach you the framework and the clinical reasoning behind it, and you apply it the way your license and training allow. If you aren’t sure how it maps to your credential, tell me on your application and I’ll give you a straight answer.

No. You need to work with, or plan to work with, this population.

If you’re on leave, between roles, still in training, or building a practice you haven’t launched yet, you’re still a fit. We work live cases in the room every single week, so you’ll learn on real presentations either way, and you’ll finish with a framework ready for your first client.

The only version of this that doesn’t work is wanting the concepts with no intention of ever using them with people.

No. This is built for a range of experience levels.

Some practitioners come in having never worked with the nervous system directly. Others have already trained in somatic or trauma modalities and want a framework that organizes what they know into an actual treatment sequence instead of a pile of tools. Both belong here. Prior specialization isn’t required — willingness to apply it is.

Bring one if you have one — that’s where the deepest learning happens. But you will not be sitting out if you don’t.

We work live cases in the room every week, and watching a case get reasoned through out loud is its own training. You can also bring a client you’ve consulted on, a past client, or a presentation you keep running into and never know what to do with.

This is the question I get most, and it always comes with something specific attached. SIBO. A cervical spine finding and daily migraines. Interstitial cystitis. Long Covid. Twenty food sensitivities.

The framework doesn’t work by diagnosis, and that’s the whole point. It works by asking a different set of questions. Does this symptom behave the way structural damage behaves, or the way a learned neural pathway behaves? Does it move, shift with context, respond to stress, cluster with other symptoms, come and go? Does the person’s history and presentation fit the patterns we see in neuroplastic symptoms?

Sometimes the answer is yes. Sometimes it’s no. Often it’s both — real tissue involvement and a nervous system amplifying it. Week one is how to make that call responsibly, including when to refer out and when not to touch it at all.

You’ll leave able to run the assessment on any presentation that walks through your door, including ones I’ve never seen.

This is the wall practitioners hit most often. You explain it. You send the book, the podcast, the research. And nothing happens.

That’s not a compliance problem. We cover how to sequence the conversation, how to introduce the mind-body connection so it lands as validating instead of dismissive, and what to actually do with the client who intellectually agrees and behaviorally does nothing.

This is week one and week four material — and it’s where most of our live case consultation time goes.

Important question, and one I got the moment the masterclass ended.

Neurodivergence is not a personality pattern, and this framework doesn’t try to change it. What is relevant: many neurodivergent people have spent years masking, overriding sensory signals, and living with a chronically activated nervous system in environments that were never built for them. That is exactly the soil neuroplastic symptoms grow in.

So the assessment stays the same and the treatment gets adapted. Interoception work often needs to be built far more slowly. Sensory input has to be accounted for. “Notice what you feel in your body” is not a neutral instruction for everyone.

We cover how to adapt pacing and interventions rather than assuming one nervous-system protocol fits every nervous system.

22.5 hours live with Grace: six 3-hour teaching sessions across six weeks. Then 1.5 hours of case consultation per month for 3 months after. You must complete 90% off all the calls in order to get CEU’s.

We will meet for 6 weeks on Thursday from 9amPT/11amMT/12pmCT/1pmET/7pm UK time starting October 22nd, skipping November 26th so the dates will be:

• October 22
• October 29
• Nov 5
• Nov 12
• Nov 19
• Dec 3

Then we will meet monthly for 3 months starting in January for 1.5 hours each time. Dates will be available half way through training.

CE credit details are confirmed with your application, since requirements vary by license and state. Reach out during the application process and we’ll walk you through what’s available for your credential.

Every session is recorded and added to your library within 24 hours. Live attendance is where the case consultation and community happens, so we’d love you there but a missed week won’t set you back. If you need CE’s than you need to be present for 90% of the live calls.

There’s no assigned coursework. The teaching happens live. What you’ll want between sessions is a client to practice on the practitioners who get the most out of this are the ones applying it the same week. *clients are not mandatory - this is a curriculum that highly encourages implementation as you learn instead of trying to be perfect at it before applying.

Because it’s the first live run, and this room gets access no later cohort will have: curriculum shaped around your actual caseload, assessed before we get started and the founding rate.

You keep your standing in the founding practitioner community. We meet monthly for 3 months for case consultations. Graduates are also considered for an affiliate arrangement for client referrals.